dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #25796
Re: Matrix-free Krylov solvers
-
To:
"Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:47:06 +0200
-
Cc:
DOLFIN Mailing List <dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
In-reply-to:
<CAA4C66Nj3ApeAfMAnZ=EcftVfi1NDHiPsAUZPzryJxbH3Mu-KA@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Thanks. I will look at it next week.
I'll be adding unit tests.
This is mostly for use in the tensorproduct/kronecker/timedependent
branches but will have some side effect features like this one.
--
Anders
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 07:40:24PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On 17 August 2012 19:15, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > ok, can you give any details or code that I can look at?
> >
>
> You probably want to implement the Epetra_Operator class:
>
> http://trilinos.sandia.gov/packages/docs/r10.12/packages/epetra/doc/html/classEpetra__Operator.html
>
> We could really do with some matrix-free unit tests.
>
> Garth
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:06:42PM +0200, Kent-Andre Mardal wrote:
> >> Yes, I think so. I've used ML in this fashion.
> >> Kent
> >>
> >> On 17 August 2012 16:28, Anders Logg <[1]logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> I want to use PETSc MatShell to create a matrix-free representation
> >> of
> >> a linear system using PETScKrylovMatrix. Is there similar
> >> functionality in Trilinos, in which case I could look into adding a
> >> common interface matrix-free Krylov solvers?
> >>
> >> Referenser
> >>
> >> 1. mailto:logg@xxxxxxxxx
> >> 2. https://launchpad.net/%7Edolfin
> >> 3. mailto:dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> 4. https://launchpad.net/%7Edolfin
> >> 5. https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> > Post to : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
Follow ups
References