dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #25809
Re: C++ question
2012/8/20 Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:00:32PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> On 20 August 2012 16:50, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I'm editing the linear algebra interface to add support for generic
>> > Krylov matrices and I'm seeing things like this:
>> >
>> >
>> > /// Create empty vector (global)
>> > boost::shared_ptr<GenericVector> create_vector() const
>> > {
>> > boost::shared_ptr<GenericVector> x(new MTL4Vector);
>> > return x;
>> > }
>> >
>> > /// Create empty vector (local)
>> > boost::shared_ptr<GenericVector> create_local_vector() const
>> > {
>> > boost::shared_ptr<GenericVector> x(new MTL4Vector);
>> > return x;
>> > }
>> >
>> > I thought () was required:
>> >
>> > boost::shared_ptr<GenericVector> x(new MTL4Vector());
>> >
>> > Has this always been the case?
>> >
>>
>> There are some instances where we need to distinguish between local
>> and distributed vectors, notably in the PETSc interface code. To work
>> through GenericVector, it appears in the MTL, uBLAS, etc code too.
>
> I know, I wasn't referring to the global vs local. I meant omitting
> the () in constructors that take no arguments:
>
> new MTL4Vector()
>
> vs
>
> new MTL4Vector
Cases exist where the behaviour will be different, but they are rare.
Compare
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/default_initialization
with
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/value_initialization
(Some examples are given in this answer: http://stackoverflow.com/a/620402 )
Benjamin
>
> --
> Anders
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References