dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I suggest adding an overloaded version of compute_vertex_values which
does not take the mesh as an argument for Functions (since the mesh is
available). Any objections?

--
Anders

--- Begin Message ---

• To: logg@xxxxxxxxx
• From: Doug Arnold <question210000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 01:25:53 -0000
• Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 91.189.90.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Delivered-to: logg@xxxxxxxxx
• Reply-to: question210000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Question #210000 on DOLFIN changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/dolfin/+question/210000

    Status: Answered => Solved

Doug Arnold confirmed that the question is solved:
Many thanks, Anders.

BTW, for others reading this, the syntax for dolfin 1.0.0 is

  vertex_values = np.zeros(mesh.num_vertices(), dtype='d')
  v.compute_vertex_values(vertex_values, mesh)

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
DOLFIN Team, which is an answer contact for DOLFIN.

--- End Message ---