dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <hake.dev@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have no objection to "size_t". As Garth says, it would also make sense
to use uintp, which is the NumPy equivalent, but then we should consider
using float_ or float64 instead of double, which is unintuitive.

Johan

On 11/22/2012 12:00 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:41:10AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Why is the type called 'sizet' and not 'size_t' in the Python
>>> interface for templated MeshFunctions?
>>>
>>
>> The appropriate name was raised as a question when the changes were
>> made. It could be sizet, size_t, uintp (numpy type), uint, etc.
> 
> I prefer size_t over sizet since it matches the C++ interface and does
> not introduce yet another type.
> 
> --
> Anders
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>