dolfin team mailing list archive

[Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx>]

Fine by me. That matches well how I envision the domains attached to ufl
forms as well.

Martin
Den 7. feb. 2013 09:17 skrev "Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> følgende:

> I'm about to start cleaning up the assemblers, and fixing some bugs
> will necessitate some interface changes. For example we have:
>
>   /// Assemble tensor
>   void assemble(GenericTensor& A,
>                 const Form& a,
>                 bool reset_sparsity=true,
>                 bool add_values=false,
>                 bool finalize_tensor=true,
>                 bool keep_diagonal=false);
>
>   /// Assemble tensor on sub domains
>   void assemble(GenericTensor& A,
>                 const Form& a,
>                 const MeshFunction<std::size_t>* cell_domains,
>                 const MeshFunction<std::size_t>* exterior_facet_domains,
>                 const MeshFunction<std::size_t>* interior_facet_domains,
>                 bool reset_sparsity=true,
>                 bool add_values=false,
>                 bool finalize_tensor=true,
>                 bool keep_diagonal=false);
>
> but calling
>
>   assemble(A, a, 0, 0, 0);
>
> is to me ambiguous in terms which function will be called. I think the
> best solution, which we've discussed, it to always attach the domain
> data to forms.
>
> Garth
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> Post to     : dolfin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>