dorsal team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:48:18AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On Aug 23 2010, Anders Logg wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:20:49AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:47 +0530, Harish Narayanan wrote:
> >>> On 8/23/10 12:44 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>> > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:41 +0530, Harish Narayanan wrote:
> >>> >> On 8/23/10 12:39 PM, noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> >>> revno: 435
> >>> >>> committer: Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> >>> branch nick: dorsal
> >>> >>> timestamp: Mon 2010-08-23 08:05:36 +0100
> >>> >>> message:
> >>> >>>   Remove SCOTCH from Fedeora 13 because of silly Scotch
> >>build > >>> system.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>   Can we get Dorsal to choose the appropriate Scotch makefile
> >>> >> automatically?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>   Removing Scotch from the list of packages will cause a problem if
> >>> >> the user has the Scotch rpm package installed.
> >>> >>> modified:
> >>> >>>   FEniCS/platforms/supported/fedora13.platform
> >>> >>
> >>> >> What is the problem with it now? It can be done (using
> >>platform > >> sniff, again), but why do you not want the one
> >>line in there to > >> help Dorsal pick the right scotch
> >>makefile?
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > It breaks on OSs that come in 32 and 64 bit flavours.
> >>>
> >>> OK, then the fix is the following.
> >>>
> >>> Use guess_architecture() in dorsal.sh to figure out if it is 32/64-bit
> >>> and do the appropriate thing.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Not quiet that simple - we need to map the OS and the number of bits to
> >>a specific Makefile. I'm not going to bother with it - I'll remove
> >>Scotch from Linux platforms unless someone wants to sort it out.
> >>
> >>Garth
> >
> >That sounds good to me. Let's remove it from Mac too.
> >
>
> If it builds without user intervention, I would leave it there.
>
> Garth

It does build.

--
Anders