drizzle-discuss team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Current status of Drizzle JDBC driver
Done. Thanks Marcus. With luck this will get the JDBC driver and Drizzle
some more users over the next few months.
On 1/4/10 2:19 PM PST, "Marcus Eriksson" <krummas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The current status is that it has a handful of real-world users, so I guess I
> cannot say much about the quality, other than the fact that it passes the
> almost 250 test cases I have (or, atleast it does when i fix the table
> definitions to always have a PK):
> http://marcus.no-ip.biz/hudson/job/drizzle-jdbc-freestyle/. ;
> Not sure what you mean by official build, but the builds at the central maven
> repo are very official (to me) :).
> I'd say, ship the driver but let users know that it is an early version and
> where to report bugs.
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Robert Hodges <robert.hodges@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Hi all,
>> I¹m working on integrating Marcus¹ recent Tungsten replication patch so that
>> we can start officially supporting Drizzle in Tungsten version 1.3. However,
>> this brings up a question: what¹s the current status of the JDBC driver and
>> is there any plan to do official builds in the near future?
>> Among other things I¹m wondering whether it makes sense to distribute a built
>> version of the JDBC or just let users (probably not large group at this
>> point) do their own builds and add the driver themselves.
>> (I could just ask Marcus but this seems like something that might be of
>> general interest.)
>> Cheers, Robert
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
>> Post to : drizzle-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp