drizzle-discuss team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: tables must have a primary key
On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:09 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Stewart Smith <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So, for Embedded InnoDB, currently I have a requirement that all
must have a primary key.
FWIW, I've never heard a good argument for not having a primary key on
a table. Ever.
Haven't I been saying we should require these?
We can use hidden ones, like I pointed out in the earlier email, but I
suspect we would be better off just requiring them.
This might fall into the bucket of "no hidden magic".