drizzle-discuss team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: tables must have a primary key
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Brian Aker <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:09 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Stewart Smith <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> So, for Embedded InnoDB, currently I have a requirement that all tables
>>> must have a primary key.
>> FWIW, I've never heard a good argument for not having a primary key on
>> a table. Ever.
> Haven't I been saying we should require these?
> We can use hidden ones, like I pointed out in the earlier email, but I
> suspect we would be better off just requiring them.
> This might fall into the bucket of "no hidden magic".