drizzle-discuss team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: problem buidling drizzle on osx 10.6
It looks like this is not the case. If I use this option then
./configure fails to find libprotobuf (which is being successfully found
when run w/o this option). Specifying multiple --with-lib-prefix also
doesn't help - in this case only the last one seems to have effect.
15.04.2010 18:58, David Shrewsbury пишет:
Yes. This option just adds to the search path.
You can get more information about configure options with:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Vladimir Kolesnikov wrote:
Ok, what if some of my libs were installed not via mac ports? Actually only gettext and boost where "port"-ed. Protobuf and couple of other where installed via configure/make. Will they still be reachable?
15.04.2010 18:31, David Shrewsbury пишет:
Mac Ports places everything in /opt/local, which isn't searched by default
by configure. You have to tell it to search here with the --with-lib-prefix option:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:05 AM, Vladimir Kolesnikov wrote:
Drizzle's configure script complains about boost dependency on OSX 10.6.2 even if boost is installed. Boost (1.42) was installed via mac ports. Any ideas how to fix this?
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : drizzle-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp