drizzle-discuss team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: about replacing loadfile with filesystem storage engine
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:39:42 +0800, ZQ <ziminq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You once mentioned one thing I can do is to replace load file with this my
> file system storage engine,
> do you mean I should abstract some general code from my storage engine and
> plug it into load file code path?
> I would like to know what's the potential problem with the original load
> file functionality?
following the existing code to do LOAD DATA INFILE shouldn't be *too*
hard, and some can probably be pretty easily reused.