dulwich-users team mailing list archive

[David Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Stupid git send-email, where'd my body go?

This implements shallow clone support on the server. The reason it's marked
as an RFC is that I don't like the way I have to pass two extra arguments
(shallow and client_shallow) down through a bunch of levels of callbacks. It
shouldn't break existing code, since they're optional arguments, but it's
clear that this approach isn't going to scale forever. Since any API
changes, like wrapping some of these arguments up into object state or a
data object, would break existing code, I thought I'd ask for suggestions.

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:41, <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> cae6290 Add eof() and unread_pkt_line() methods to Protocol.
> 4b46bf0 MissingObjectFinder: minor cleanup: 80 chars, others.
> f0bee0e server: Correct short-circuiting operation for no-op fetches.
> c346233 Add shallow clone support to the server.
>
>  NEWS                                 |    9 +++
>  dulwich/object_store.py              |   42 +++++++++--
>  dulwich/protocol.py                  |   40 ++++++++++-
>  dulwich/repo.py                      |   21 ++++--
>  dulwich/server.py                    |  112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  dulwich/tests/compat/server_utils.py |   73 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  dulwich/tests/compat/test_web.py     |    7 ++-
>  dulwich/tests/test_protocol.py       |   34 +++++++++-
>  dulwich/tests/test_server.py         |  125
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  9 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>