dulwich-users team mailing list archive
-
dulwich-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00210
Re: [PATCH 0/4] RFC/implemenmtation of shallow clone support.
Hi Jelmer,
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:01, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:41 -0700, dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > cae6290 Add eof() and unread_pkt_line() methods to Protocol.
> > 4b46bf0 MissingObjectFinder: minor cleanup: 80 chars, others.
> > f0bee0e server: Correct short-circuiting operation for no-op fetches.
> > c346233 Add shallow clone support to the server.
> >
> > NEWS | 9 +++
> > dulwich/object_store.py | 42 +++++++++--
> > dulwich/protocol.py | 40 ++++++++++-
> > dulwich/repo.py | 21 ++++--
> > dulwich/server.py | 112
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > dulwich/tests/compat/server_utils.py | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > dulwich/tests/compat/test_web.py | 7 ++-
> > dulwich/tests/test_protocol.py | 34 +++++++++-
> > dulwich/tests/test_server.py | 125
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 9 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> I've had a brief look at these patches and, just to be on the safe side,
> I would like to wait with merging them before releasing 0.6.2. I'll need
> some time to do a proper review anyway.
>
> What I think I might do is to create a 0.6 branch that we can use for
> any further releases in the 0.6.x series and starting to work on 0.7 in
> trunk in the mean time.
>
That plan sounds fine to me. Does that mean you'd target this feature for an
0.7 release?
> Cheers,
>
> Jelmer
>
References