dulwich-users team mailing list archive
-
dulwich-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00423
Re: Test runners, nose and python 2.7
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:46:51AM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 04:23:54PM -0500, Augie Fackler wrote:
> > >> We can codify that in setup.py and make
> > >> it the One True Test System (and depending on unittest2 for old
> > >> Pythons means that we can continue using the normal SkipTest
> > >> approach *and* dispense with the madness in test/__init__ that tries
> > >> to get the "right" SkipTest. I'm happy to take on this work if
> > >> nobody objects.
> > > I can live with unittest2 as default fallback test runner but
> > > would like to keep the support for using testtools without the need to
> > > install unittest2. What do you think about the attached patch?
> > Should probably also list unittest2 in the test_requires stanza of the
> > setup() call in setup.py if sys.version < (2,7).
> That's a good point.
I've pushed the switch to unittest + unittest2 but without the test_requires stanza.
Not having it doesn't seem to break anything (we never had it for nose) and I can't
work out what to set exactly. Patches to add it welcome.
Cheers,
Jelmer
Follow ups
References
-
Test runners, nose and python 2.7
From: Jelmer Vernooij, 2010-12-26
-
Re: Test runners, nose and python 2.7
From: Augie Fackler, 2010-12-26
-
Re: Test runners, nose and python 2.7
From: Jelmer Vernooij, 2010-12-26
-
Re: Test runners, nose and python 2.7
From: Augie Fackler, 2010-12-26
-
Re: Test runners, nose and python 2.7
From: Jelmer Vernooij, 2010-12-26
-
Re: Test runners, nose and python 2.7
From: Augie Fackler, 2010-12-26
-
Re: Test runners, nose and python 2.7
From: Jelmer Vernooij, 2010-12-27