← Back to team overview

dulwich-users team mailing list archive

Re: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi'

 

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:19:33PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 05:38:56PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:36:54PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >> >> I try to clone my repository from GitHub with hg-git and it fails.
> >> >> Dulwich 1.9.4, Hg-Git 0.5.0, Windows.
> >> >> Please, CC.
> >> >>
> >> >> destination directory: recordscreen
> >> >> ["git-upload-pack '/techtonik/recordscreen'"]
> >> >> ** Unknown exception encountered with possibly-broken third-party
> >> >> extension hggit
> >> >> ** which supports versions 2.2.3 of Mercurial.
> >> >> ** Please disable hggit and try your action again.
> >> >> ** If that fixes the bug please report it to
> >> >> https://bitbucket.org/durin42/hg-git/issues
> >> >> ** Python 2.7.5 (default, May 15 2013, 22:43:36) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
> >> >> ** Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 2.8)
> >> >> ** Extensions loaded: churn, color, convert, evolve, hggit, strip, mq,
> >> >> rebase, record
> >> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> >>   File "hg", line 38, in <module>
> >> >>   File "mercurial\dispatch.pyc", line 28, in run
> >> >>   File "mercurial\dispatch.pyc", line 69, in dispatch
> >> >>   File "mercurial\dispatch.pyc", line 133, in _runcatch
> >> >>   File "mercurial\dispatch.pyc", line 806, in _dispatch
> >> >>   File "mercurial\dispatch.pyc", line 585, in runcommand
> >> >>   File "mercurial\extensions.pyc", line 196, in wrap
> >> >>   File "hgext\color.pyc", line 419, in colorcmd
> >> >>   File "mercurial\dispatch.pyc", line 897, in _runcommand
> >> >>   File "mercurial\dispatch.pyc", line 868, in checkargs
> >> >>   File "mercurial\dispatch.pyc", line 803, in <lambda>
> >> >>   File "mercurial\util.pyc", line 512, in check
> >> >>   File "mercurial\commands.pyc", line 1282, in clone
> >> >>   File "mercurial\hg.pyc", line 372, in clone
> >> >>   File "mercurial\localrepo.pyc", line 2431, in clone
> >> >>   File "C:\hg-git\hggit\hgrepo.py", line 14, in pull
> >> >>     return git.fetch(remote.path, heads)
> >> >>   File "C:\hg-git\hggit\git_handler.py", line 205, in fetch
> >> >>     refs = self.fetch_pack(remote, heads)
> >> >>   File "C:\hg-git\hggit\git_handler.py", line 1016, in fetch_pack
> >> >>     ret = client.fetch_pack(path, determine_wants, graphwalker,
> >> >> f.write, progress.progress)
> >> >>   File "dulwich\client.pyc", line 527, in fetch_pack
> >> >>   File "dulwich\client.pyc", line 144, in read_pkt_refs
> >> >>   File "dulwich\protocol.pyc", line 147, in read_pkt_seq
> >> >>   File "dulwich\protocol.pyc", line 104, in read_pkt_line
> >> >> ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: 'logi'
> >> >
> >> > Can you reproduce it with dulwich clone (without hg-git)? Is there an easy way
> >> > for us to reproduce this?
> >> No. I can't reproduce this error with "dulwich clone".
> > Can you try patching hg-git so it uses LocalGitClient rather than
> > SubprocessGitClient? Does that fix the issue?
> 
> Patched as:
> diff -r 24b80a953f06 hggit/git_handler.py
> --- a/hggit/git_handler.py Sun Dec 15 15:25:31 2013 -0500
> +++ b/hggit/git_handler.py Wed Dec 18 22:10:41 2013 +0300
> @@ -1379,4 +1379,4 @@
>                  return client.HttpGitClient(uri, thin_packs=False), uri
> 
>          # if its not git or git+ssh, try a local url..
> -        return client.SubprocessGitClient(thin_packs=False), uri
> +        return client.LocalGitClient(thin_packs=False), uri
> 
> 
This doesn't actually appear to be the codepath that hg-git is using.
LocalGitClient doesn't use a protocol at all, so you shouldn't be
seeing read_pkt_line in the backtrace if it's using LocalGitClient
rather than SubprocessGitClient.

Cheers,

Jelmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Follow ups

References