| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Question #139585 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/139585
Status: Open => Answered
Kenneth Loafman proposed the following answer:
Yes, the granularity is one second. It's a limitation of the tarfile.py
that we currently use. We should update to the newest version available in
the Python libraries, but no one has had the time to do so.
..Ken
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Mechanical snail <
question139585@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> New question #139585 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/139585
>
> Duplicity 0.6.10 (the latest version in the Ubuntu Lucid repositories)
> seems to have a timestamp granularity of 1 second. Has this been fixed in
> development versions?
>
> (Possibly relevant implementation details: GNU tar does support nanosecond
> timestamps, but you have to explicitly tell it to create POSIX-format tar
> files.)
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are a member of
> duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
