duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[edso <question264557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #264557 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/264557

edso proposed the following answer:
On 07.04.2015 11:21, Domoradov Alex wrote:
> Question #264557 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/264557
> 
> Domoradov Alex posted a new comment:
>> duplicity thinks it is corrupt. that's what it saves the checksums for.
> May be I need to add some flags to my ssh transport?

the difference can have many causes, ranging from duplicity bugs to
storage inconsistencies on the backend.

> P.S.
> Can I verify integrity of all archives on the destination host?
> 

you want to circumvent downloading the whole backup i guess?

if you can run duplicity there, yes, kind of. the 'verify' action is a
bastard of verify and compare against source. as you do not have the
source on the backend, you might rather go with a full restore using the
ignore error switch and redirect the whole cmd line output eg.
'1>log.txt  2>&1' to a log file to sift for errors later.

..ede/duply.net

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
duplicity-team, which is an answer contact for Duplicity.