duplicity-team team mailing list archive

[Wernight <question284247@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #284247 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/284247

    Status: Answered => Open

Wernight is still having a problem:
The setup with GitLab is pretty good so I admit it's also a great
improvement. It allows also full control of the builds.

GitHub may not be itself open source but I feel that it's just so widely
used with so many accounts, cross references, easy forking... That it isn't
just negligible overhead in this case. That's just my take. I can't say
having an open source end to end spirit is bad, and both are good
improvements.

Le mer. 8 juin 2016 à 19:37, Aaron Whitehouse <
question284247@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Your question #284247 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/284247
>
> Aaron Whitehouse posted a new comment:
> I think that I mentioned this somewhere else, but my main issue with
> GitHub is that it is not open source.
>
> GitLab is an open core equivalent if the aim is to go for a Git-based
> repository etc:
> https://b.agilob.net/choose-gitlab-for-your-next-project
> I can understand that someone who is used to Git wouldn't want to learn
> Bazaar.
>
> I'm less worried about people not having accounts to file bugs/fork
> projects and submit code. It seems like a pretty small overhead and only
> happens when the person is relatively motivated to proceed. I can't
> imagine many developers decide which projects to contribute to based on
> where they are hosted -- It is obviously annoying, but I don't think
> that should be why we move.
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>

-- 
You received this question notification because your team duplicity-team
is an answer contact for Duplicity.