dx-packages team mailing list archive

[justin parker <1252121@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

IDK whats going on and thanks to those like SETH, now the bug is so
split who knows if it will ever be fixed.... Pablo Thanks for your
help... I'm not that much a newb but also not a developer. I know python
and work in Networking, but when it comes to Ubuntu application support
sorry to say I don't even know where to start...

Yanpas, I tried your workarounds, sorry to say they did not work :(
Thanks for your effort though... It would be nice to hear from a dev.
How we can signal them? Maybe if we offer money? Hey Devs I'll pay! I
will pay you money to help us with a fix.... If I said this to Microsoft
they would fix it same day, lol.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to systemd-shim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252121

Title:
  missing PrepareForSleep signal after resuming, causing networking to
  stay disabled

Status in NetworkManager:
  New
Status in wicd:
  New
Status in “systemd-shim” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in “systemd-shim” source package in Saucy:
  Confirmed
Status in “systemd-shim” source package in Trusty:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  As per request from bug #1184262, this is a new report, along with
  dbus (to be attached)

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: systemd-services 204-0ubuntu19
  Uname: Linux 3.12.0-custom x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sun Nov 17 20:24:41 2013
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-17 (31 days ago)

  SRU INFORMATION:
  FIX: https://github.com/desrt/systemd-shim/commit/9e1ebe3ab (in trusty already)

  Regression potential: Low. Flushing the session bus was introduced in
  version 4 and is obviously bogus as in a system D-BUS service there is
  no session bus. This causes lots of confusing error messages and
  unnecessary overhead like trying to start dbus-launch. Flushing the
  system bus is low-risk, in most cases it's a no-op and it would
  otherwise prevent losing signals after waking up. No known
  regressions.

  TEST CASE: Run several suspend/resume cycles with the lid, session
  indicator menu, and verify that the network comes back up. It is known
  that this fix is necessary but not sufficient, so it is not expected
  to fix all cases. But it should not make things worse, so if network
  now does not come up any more on a machine where it previously worked
  this would count as failure/regression.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/1252121/+subscriptions