dx-packages team mailing list archive
-
dx-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #42415
[Bug 1770146] Re: [MIR] libayatana-appindicator
What is difference between libappindicator and libayatana-appindicator?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in libayatana-appindicator package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
[Availability]
* Everywhere
[Rationale]
* Appindicator is dead, we should move it to universe and switch to the "better" and "supported" ayatana version
[Security]
* No security bugs found
[Quality assurance]
* Strongly maintained in Debian, lots of packages in main used to have deltas to drop and switch to appindicator, I think we will save a lot of work by just syncing stuff and not maintaining appindicator anymore (at least moving it to universe)
[Dependencies]
* All deps in main
[Standards compliance]
* New compat level
* Maintained in sync with Debian
* It builds a python2 bind, maybe we can just not MIR all binaries there
[Maintenance]
* Debian maintains it, and is doing a port to ayatana of all packages.
[Background information]
* I think we can also just MIR libayatana-appindicator3-1
reverse-depends -c main src:libappindicator -r cosmic
Reverse-Depends
===============
* network-manager-gnome (for libappindicator3-1)
* remmina (for libappindicator3-1)
* transmission-gtk (for libappindicator3-1)
all the three packages are now using ayatana in -proposed pocket
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libayatana-appindicator/+bug/1770146/+subscriptions