← Back to team overview

dx-packages team mailing list archive

[Bug 1633319] Re: memory leak in indicator-datetime

 

I had the same problem.  Sunk over a day into trying to figure it out.
I'm taking no chances: I removed evolution.  I might reinstall it
sometime when I am no under such a crunch.

What I find really frustrating is that I would expect the OOM (Out of
Memory) killer to recognize that the process had consumed 14 GBytes of
virtual memory and kill it, but it didn't.  I would argue that if a user
space process that can bring a system to its knees, then there is
something else wrong with the system.  I don't know enough about kernel
internals to put my finger on it, and I am in a bit of time crunch right
now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime in Ubuntu.
Matching subscriptions: dx-packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633319

Title:
  memory leak in indicator-datetime

Status in indicator-datetime package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After upgrading from 16.04 to 16.10 on the System76 Serval WS
  indicator-datetime-service is consuming all the system memory from
  3.7GB up to 32 GB in 30 seconds. The system kills the indicator-
  datetime-service process and indicator-datetime-service restarts and
  memory consumption repeats until killed again. All swap memory is
  consumed in this pattern.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: indicator-datetime 15.10+16.10.20160820.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-22.24-generic 4.8.0
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-22-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Oct 14 00:12:00 2016
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  SourcePackage: indicator-datetime
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to yakkety on 2016-10-14 (0 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1633319/+subscriptions


References