ecryptfs-devel team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question

To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:17:34 +0900
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ecryptfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1232215916.7015.78.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com>

Dave Kleikamp:
> For a regular file, the size of the upper inode is not the same as the
> size of the lower inode.  The lower inode includes the header blocks
> which are not visible in the upper inode.  So ecryptfs_interpose() will
> overwrite the correct upper inode size.

Then it means updating i_size in ecryptfs_link() is unnecessary...


J. R. Okajima

Follow ups

Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: Dave Kleikamp, 2009-01-19

References

Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: Dave Kleikamp, 2009-01-13
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: Tyler Hicks, 2009-01-15
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: hooanon05, 2009-01-16
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: Dave Kleikamp, 2009-01-16
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: hooanon05, 2009-01-17
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: Dave Kleikamp, 2009-01-17
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: hooanon05, 2009-01-17
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question
From: Dave Kleikamp, 2009-01-17