epoptes team mailing list archive

[Launchpad Bug Tracker <1018498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This bug was fixed in the package epoptes - 0.5.5-0ubuntu0.1

---------------
epoptes (0.5.5-0ubuntu0.1) precise-proposed; urgency=low

  * New upstream bugfix releases (0.5.4 and 0.5.5):
    - Split vncport to vncviewerport and vncserverport (LP: #1013808).
    - Remove workaround for bug fixed in twisted. (LP: #943598).
    - Ensure that epoptes-client is actually booted to LTSP before assuming it
      is operating as a Fat client. (LP: #1018498).
    - New translations: Arabic (ar), Catalan (ca), Czech (cs), Galician (gl),
      Lithuanian (lt), Somali (so), Turkish (tr), Chinese (Simplified) (zh_CN)
    - Updated translations: Afrikaans (af), Hebrew (he), Malay (ms),
      Norwegian Bokmal (nb), Dutch (nl), Portuguese (pt), Russian (ru)
 -- Stephane Graber <stgraber@xxxxxxxxxx>   Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:04:46 -0400

** Changed in: epoptes (Ubuntu Precise)
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Epoptes
Developers, which is the registrant for Epoptes.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018498

Title:
  Ensure that epoptes-client is actually booted to ltsp before setting
  LTSP_FATCLIENT=True

Status in Epoptes:
  Fix Released
Status in “epoptes” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “epoptes” source package in Precise:
  Fix Released
Status in “epoptes” source package in Quantal:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Epoptes version: 0.5.3-1

  If one installs epoptes-client in a standalone (non-LTSP) PC which for
  some reason also has the ltsp-client package installed, then that PC
  is reported to be a fat client in the Epoptes UI, even if it was
  booted locally.

  == SRU ==
  [rational]
  Epoptes reports regular workstations with ltsp-client installed as fat clients even though they didn't boot from LTSP.

  [test case]
  1) Install epoptes
  2) Install ltsp-client
  3) Restart epoptes
  4) Start classroom manager on teacher computer

  4) should report the machine as a workstation, not a fat client

  [regression potential]
  The fix just adds a check for /proc/cmdline, the check while not perfect should match 99% of the cases where ltsp-client and epoptes are installed on a non-ltsp machine.
  If this still doesn't match, then the client will be reported as a fat client, but overall, the logic can't be any more wrong that it's today.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/epoptes/+bug/1018498/+subscriptions