erma-core team mailing list archive

["Matthew Kemp" <mattkemp@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think that we should provide the ability to expose JMX runtime controls in
erma-lib. I think that we should keep erma-api as lean as possible, but
there are many OS projects that use JMX as a means of exposing controls. The
actual means of exposing the controls is up for debate.

Matt


On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Ray Krueger <raykrueger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >>> The error is:
> >>> build.xml:99: taskdef A class needed by
> >>> org.apache.commons.compiler.AttributeCompiler cannot be found:
> >>> xjavadoc/ant/XJavadocTask
> >>>
> >>> The commons-attributes task is currently commented out so that the rest
> of
> >>> the build works.
> >
> > Why the hell are we trying to use commons-attributes anyway? Maybe
> > Orbitz should keep that old junk to itself :P
> >
>
> Was just chatting with Matt Kemp offline...
> The commons-attributes noise is being added to Erma classes to expose
> them as MBeans. I, personally, disagree with this entirely.
> On one hand, I dont' think we should be adding JMX stuff to it at all,
> and on the other hand we definitely shouldn't be doing it with
> commons-attributes. JMX and commons-attributes are Orbitz specific use
> cases in summary.
>