erma-core team mailing list archive

["Matthew Kemp" <mattkemp@xxxxxxxxx>]

We should decide on how to handle that. One option would be to make an
erma-core repo and always have that be the latest official release. In my
opinion it's going to be hard having one developer only maintain an official
copy.

Matt


On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Doug Barth <dougbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Dec 16, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Matthew Kemp wrote:
>
>  Releases 3.1 and 3.2 have now been tagged.
>>
>
>
> Is Steven's repo still the "official" repo?
>
> --
> Doug Barth
>
>