fenics team mailing list archive
-
fenics team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00098
Re: Sieve
-
To:
Matthew Knepley <knepley@xxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:01:56 +0200
-
Cc:
Discussion of FEniCS development <fenics-dev@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
In-reply-to:
<a9f269830606091143j11d7ab1en527ef2dc08649b60@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mutt/1.5.11
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:43:27PM -0500, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Cool. How's Mercurial working out so far? Have you had any problems
> with it?
>
> /Anders
>
>
> I like it. Its not as nice as BK, but workable. The problems are almost all
> related to lack of bundling of operations. For instance, I always have to
> do:
>
> hg pull
> hg update -m
> hg commit
>
> instead of the BK model where it all happens correctly in sequence.
>
> Matt
I often end up with
hg commit
hg push default
Aargh, someone beat me to it so I need to pull
hg undo
hg pull
hg update
Aargh, forgot -m
hg update -m
hg commit
hg push default
:-)
/Anders
Follow ups
References