← Back to team overview

fenics team mailing list archive

Re: Release names

 

Young Evariste's interest in duelity theory took him to a particular fixed
point I would prefer to avoid for the time being,so no thanks.


On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Ridgway Scott <ridg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Rob,
> are you planning to develop this idea of "duelity theory" further?
>
> Ridg
>
> On Apr 7, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Robert Kirby wrote:
>
> Augustin Cauchy (or Alonzo Church if we want to be more computational)Blaise
> Pascal
> Carl Friedrich Gauss
> David Hilbert
> Evariste Galois/Emile Picard (depending on whether we care about "duelity"
> or fixed-points ;)
>
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> But that would be a 'J', right?
>>
>> Or does he have a middle name starting with 'A'?
>>
>> --
>> Anders
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:53:28PM -0700, Ridgway Scott wrote:
>> > Albert was not very good at math and not computationally oriented.
>> > von Neumann would make a better analogy.
>> >
>> > Ridg
>> >
>> > On Apr 7, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Anders Logg wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes, good idea! How about using first names?
>> >>
>> >> Starting with A, should this one be Albert? Or are there other
>> >> options?
>> >>
>> >> We also need adjectives (just like Ubuntu). What should it be?
>> >>
>> >> How about we make the first release
>> >>
>> >>  Awesome Albert (FEniCS 9.04)
>> >>
>> >> ?
>> >>
>> >> We also need to prepare a list of names for future releases.
>> >> Here are two I want to include:
>> >>
>> >>  Bouncing Boris (Galerkin)
>> >>  Gleaming Gottfried (Wilhelm Leibniz)
>> >>
>> >> Other suggestions?
>> >>
>> >> -- Anders
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:05:12PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
>> >>> I think so. Maybe 0.x for features and 0.x.y for bugfixes only?
>> >>>
>> >>> I like the FEniCS 9.04 idea. Maybe we can have release
>> >>> names as well, from famous scientists or something :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Martin
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>> Nice! :-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Will there be 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, etc on the way to 1.0?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:34:30PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>> 0.2.0 [2009-04-07]
>> >>>>>  - Initial release of UFL.
>> >>>>> 0.1.0 [...]
>> >>>>>  - Unreleased development versions of UFL.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Martin
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> UFL-dev mailing list
>> >>>>> UFL-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>> http://fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ufl-dev
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> iEYEARECAAYFAknbkosACgkQTuwUCDsYZdFMCwCdGm7XGHWtUGi5hJLMolcU9nZy
>> >>>> I08An3v頓䋀륄쮛ೡ锦㨹
>> >>>> =fdIg
>> >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> FEniCS-dev mailing list
>> >> FEniCS-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-dev
>> >
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAknbr8AACgkQTuwUCDsYZdEZCQCfTAVUEHkiZE07a0lo87MVObmm
>> GdAAn0VBS4PCcozFiM1vYuNgDFNA2XJQ
>> =cVqE
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FEniCS-dev mailing list
>> FEniCS-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-dev
>>
>>
>
>

References