fenics team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

ok, so one more for a(u, v). It's not surprising or you would need to
rewrite that book. ;-)

Current results:

  Anders: ambivalent
  Garth: neutral, maybe a(u, v)
  Hans Petter: a(u, v)
  Kent: a(u, v)
  Marie: a(v, u)
  Patrick: a(v, u)
  Doug: a(u, v)
  Ridg: a(u, v)

--
Anders


On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 07:40:26AM -0700, Ridgway Scott wrote:
> I am formally ambivalent in the sense that it is just notation and thus
> there cannot be any mathematical argument one way or the other.
> But I support Doug's analysis: a(u,v) is the way it is commonly used
> even though it is backwards with respect to the standard matrix
> numbering. So I have to say: why change? So a(u,v) for me.
>
> Ridg
>
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Anders Logg wrote:
>
> >Here's a summary of opinions (in order of appearance):
> >

> > Garth: neutral, maybe a(u, v)
> > Hans Petter: a(u, v)
> > Kent: a(u, v)
> > Marie: a(v, u)
> > Patrick: a(v, u)
> > Doug: a(u, v)
> >
> >More thoughts/opinions?
> >
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature