fenics team mailing list archive
-
fenics team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01106
Re: Docstrings etc
-
To:
fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:17:08 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<20100827111435.GB1748@olorin>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100516 Thunderbird/3.0.4
On 27. aug. 2010 13:14, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:09:06PM +0200, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
>
>
>> On a related note, it is interesting that only the three of us appears
>> to have an opinion about the look and feel of the documentation of the
>> programmer's reference. Are we perhaps making a big deal out of
>> something which nobody will use anyway?
>>
> I would be good to get some more comments from others.
>
>
Frankly, I don't really give a darn.
I think we should have a programmer's reference. I will use it
frequently. I will use it mainly to see what kind of functions that are
available from a class. I think it is important that it is up-to-date.
Aside from that, I trust you to devise a clever setup.
--
Marie
Follow ups
References
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Anders Logg, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Garth N. Wells, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Garth N. Wells, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Garth N. Wells, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Garth N. Wells, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Kristian Ølgaard, 2010-08-27
-
Re: Docstrings etc
From: Anders Logg, 2010-08-27