fenics team mailing list archive

[Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 01. sep. 2010 14:15, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:12:29PM +0200, Marie Rognes wrote:
>   
>> On 01. sep. 2010 14:05, Anders Logg wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 11:55:34AM -0000, noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> revno: 151
>>>> committer: Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> branch nick: fenics-doc
>>>> timestamp: Wed 2010-09-01 13:52:09 +0200
>>>> message:
>>>>   Fix comment to match code to make verify_demo script more happy.
>>>> modified:
>>>>   source/demos/la/eigenvalue/python/documentation.rst
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>>>> === modified file 'source/demos/la/eigenvalue/python/documentation.rst'
>>>> --- source/demos/la/eigenvalue/python/documentation.rst	2010-08-31 19:57:18 +0000
>>>> +++ source/demos/la/eigenvalue/python/documentation.rst	2010-09-01 11:52:09 +0000
>>>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>>>>    mesh = Mesh("box_with_dent.xml.gz")
>>>>    V = FunctionSpace(mesh, "CG", 1)
>>>>
>>>> -  # Define basis and then form the stiffness matrix
>>>> +  # Define basis and bilinear form
>>>>    u = TrialFunction(V)
>>>>    v = TestFunction(V)
>>>>    a = dot(grad(v), grad(u))*dx
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Another thing to fix is a(u, v) in all the new demos.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>
>> Ok.  Am reading through the demo documentation -- will  fix as I go along.
>>     
> Great. Watch out for the NS docs, they're not proofread at all but
> they do have a(u, v)...
>
>   


PS: What is the status of the two different demo directories -- which
contains the "correct ones"?

--
Marie