fenics team mailing list archive

[David Ham <David.Ham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > How should we go about making the change? Is it enough if everyone just
> > responds to this list? Or do we need something more formal like David
> > Ham suggests?
>
> Can you reiterate what he suggested.

I can reiterate what he suggested ;).

In essence, if you write code as part of your job, your employer owns 
the copyright, not you. The Fluidity project handles this by requiring a 
copyright licensing letter from every individual contributor and from 
the copyright department at their institution. The Institution letter says:

CONSENT TO COPYRIGHT LICENSING UNDER THE LGPL

On behalf of name of <commercialisation organisation> I hereby give my
consent to the redistribution and/or modification of <name of 
university> contributions to the Fluidity/Imperial College Ocean Model 
project under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as 
published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the 
License, or (at each distributor's option) any later version.

The individual letters say essentially the same thing with the obvious 
changes.

To be really safe in terms of knowing that you absolutely, legally do 
have the right to distribute under a given licence, I think you need to 
do something like that. However you might also take the position that as 
long as the individual contributors are happy, the universities will be 
too. Imperial is very mercenary so I wouldn't take that for granted but 
your institutions might be more enlightened.

Regards,

David

> Johan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> Post to     : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


--
Dr David Ham
Applied Modelling and Computation Group,
Department of Earth Science and Engineering,
Imperial College London,

http://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/david.ham