fenics team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:04:27PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 15 June 2012 12:01, Johannes Ring <johannr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> UFL and ffc both need 1.0.1 and 1.1.0.
> >>
> >> There are no changes in lp:ufl/1.0.x since 1.0.0 so why do we need two
> >> releases of UFL?
> >
> > I have some changes to add. Just needs testing.
>
> OK.
>
> >> I agree with Marie that it is confusing. The changes between UFC trunk
> >> and 2.0.x are minimal, so we should only need one release of UFC.
> >>
> >> Johannes
> >
> > In general, 1.0.x fit together, and 1.1.x fit together.
> >
> > UFC is the exception for historical reasons.
> > Once UFC becomes incompatible with the 1.0.x line, make it 2.1.x.
>
> OK, so we will need
>
>  DOLFIN 1.0.1
>  FFC 1.0.1
>  Instant 1.0.1
>  UFC 2.0.6
>  UFL 1.0.1
>  Viper 1.0.1
>
> and
>
>  DOLFIN 1.1.0
>  FFC 1.1.0
>  FIAT 1.1.0
>  Instant 1.1.0
>  UFC 2.0.6 (same as above)
>  UFL 1.1.0
>  Viper 1.1.0

It seems like reality is catching up with us. I'm at a conference,
Garth is busy and we have not had time to make a release candidate.

So let's just relax and make the release when we've found time for a
code/bug sprint and one or more release candidates.

--
Anders