fenics team mailing list archive
-
fenics team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02052
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:03:50AM +0100, Roland Siegbert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > And still no one with a feature branch has claimed that it would be a
> > problem to start with a fresh clone. The only thing we would lose
> > would be the history of the feature branches.
> That's strange indeed. I would scream out loud, if a repository
> migrates and my feature branch and all the work buried in there would
> be dropped in the process, except the distance is a commit of five
> lines or less...
The changes can easily be patched and then committed on the git side.
The only thing we lose is the internal history of how the patch came
about, which seems like a small issue to me.
--
Anders
References
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-26
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Florian Rathgeber, 2013-03-26
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-26
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Florian Rathgeber, 2013-03-26
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-26
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Florian Rathgeber, 2013-03-27
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-27
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Roland Siegbert, 2013-03-28
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Anders Logg, 2013-03-28
-
Re: [Dolfin] Deadline for merge of development branches
From: Roland Siegbert, 2013-03-28