ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00465
Re: Restructure computation of reference tensor to use less memory. [...]
-
To:
Discussion of FFC development <ffc-dev@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Matthew Knepley <knepley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:45:49 -0600
-
Cc:
Discussion of FIAT development <fiat-dev@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
In-reply-to:
<20051206164220.GF31303@galerkin> (Anders Logg's message of "Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:42:20 -0600")
-
User-agent:
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)
Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:02:35AM -0600, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> > Rob, would it be much work to switch FIAT to SciPy from Numeric and
>> > LinearAlgebra?
>>
>> Actually, I think this would be a waste of time. At the last SciPy conference,
>> Travis announced he was submitting a PEP to try and get Numeric 3.0 directly
>> into the core. I think this is likely. Also, it is a separate package from
>> SciPy, which is quite large.
>>
>> Matt
>
> Good to know. So the suggestion is to stick to Numeric until it
> becomes part of the Python core, or until the PEP is rejected in which
> case we switch to SciPy?
Yes.
Matt
--
"Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir Alec Guiness
References