ffc team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Ilmar Wilbers wrote:

> but it still breaks the code (the buildbot is not happy). Any way to avoid
> numerical precision errors? Like including a function in regression.py for
> setting the output with a limited number of decimals, or taking the
> absolute value of the numbers from the verification file and the output,
> and ignoring errors smaller then a certain epsilon?

Looks like it works again now.

> Also, would be nice to have an option for viewdiff that does not require
> X, that is, diff or the like instead of meld. Maybe a command line
> argument?

Fixed, use -nw to run with diff instead of meld.

> ilmar
> 
> > The buildbot address is http://fenics.org:8010/ffc/, by the way. You can
> look at the output of the different steps by clicking on the 'stdio'
> link.

The link to the buildbot is also on the FEniCS main page.

-- 
Anders


> >
> > ilmar
> >
> > Ilmar Wilbers skrev:
> >> I am getting regression errors on the Buildbot for both 32-bit Linux
> and
> >> Mac, 64-bit Linus seems fine, for some reason:
> >> *** Regression test failed for 1 of 23 forms:
> >>   P5tet.form
> >> Will try to include the output from meld, but it will have to wait
> 'till
> >> I get to work, just thought I'd let you know in advance.
> >> ilmar
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> FFC-dev mailing list
> >> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > FFC-dev mailing list
> > FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev