ffc team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:39:31PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> Quoting buildbot@xxxxxxxxxx:
> 
> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-linux-64 on FEniCS Buildbot.
> > Full details are available at:
> >  http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-linux-64/builds/3
> >
> > Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/
> >
> > Buildslave for this Build: linux-64
> >
> > Build Reason:
> > Build Source Stamp: HEAD
> > Blamelist: k.b.oelgaard
> >
> > BUILD FAILED: failed ffc check
> 
> I don't get this error. It complains about the JIT compiler not being fast
> enough, but it is OK on my computer.
> 
> JIT in-memory cache: 9.08374786377e-05
> JIT disk cache:      0.116662979126
> Reasonable values are 0.002 and 0.03

Something seems to have happened with the disk cache. You get 0.1
seconds. I have

  JIT in-memory cache: 9.70363616943e-05
  JIT disk cache:      0.0144801139832

The disk cache involves computing the signature. Has something change
wrt computing signatures?

-- 
Anders

> F..
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: Test that JIT compiler is fast enough.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "test.py", line 254, in testPoisson
>     self.assertTrue(dt1 < 0.1) ## Is this threshold too strict??
> AssertionError
> 
> Kristian
> 
> > sincerely,
> >  -The Buildbot
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FFC-dev mailing list
> > FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature