ffc team mailing list archive

[Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting Johannes Ring <johannr@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi,
>
> this buildslave is running on potassium which is not a dedicated buildbot
> machine. It is therefore running with a nice value of 19 and it is
> currently under heavy load so that is probably the reason for the unit
> test failure.
>
> Sorry, should have told you earlier.

OK, we'll just ignore the failures then.

Kristian

> Johannes
>
> On Wed, March 4, 2009 14:57, buildbot@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-linux-64 on FEniCS
> > Buildbot.
> > Full details are available at:
> >  http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-linux-64/builds/5
> >
> > Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/
> >
> > Buildslave for this Build: linux-64
> >
> > Build Reason:
> > Build Source Stamp: HEAD
> > Blamelist: k.b.oelgaard
> >
> > BUILD FAILED: failed ffc check
> >
> > sincerely,
> >  -The Buildbot
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FFC-dev mailing list
> > FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
>