ffc team mailing list archive

[Kristian Oelgaard <k.b.oelgaard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting Johan Hake <hake@xxxxxxxxx>:

> On Monday 06 July 2009 13:02:18 Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 12:44:57PM +0200, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just a minor issue. For some arrays in the generated code we use:
> > >
> > > const static
> > >
> > > others uses
> > >
> > > static const
> > >
> > > Is there a right or wrong way, if not, which one should we use (if we
> > > want to be consistent in the code)?
> > >
> > > It's just a small change in the format, but we will probably have to
> > > change the references for the regression tests.
> >
> > I think it should be static const:
> >
> > http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t291248-const-static-vs-static-const.
> >html
>
> >From one of the last comments it says that the rule is that "static" should
> be
> in the beginning of a declaration.

Agree, I've changed the ufcformat.py file accordingly and updated all references
for the regression tests. Thanks.

Kristian

> Johan
> _______________________________________________
> FFC-dev mailing list
> FFC-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ffc-dev
>