Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Johan Hake wrote:
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 14:57:20 Garth N. Wells wrote:Johan Hake wrote:On Wednesday 19 August 2009 14:21:12 Garth N. Wells wrote:Garth N. Wells wrote:Kent Andre wrote:Not sure what we have to do actually. I suppose I want get any clue from the demo/function/restriction demo? I see that Kent has modified the dolfin.FunctionSpace to reflect the present (broken) implementation of restriction, anything in that line? Should such an implementation has been done in FunctionSpaceBase instead of FunctionSpace? Kent? JohanThis restriction is different in the sense that the restriction is made by the standard element on a sub mesh. The restriction in focus now is on the complete mesh but for only a part of the element. Combined, these two features will be very powerful. I guess the sub-mesh restriction stuff is broken due to the parallel mesh.I've attached an example solver. To make it work for P^k with k > 2 we need to restrict some functions to cell facets. Using FFC, we do scalar = FiniteElement("Lagrange", "triangle", 3) dscalar = FiniteElement("Discontinuous Lagrange", "triangle", 3) # This syntax restricts the space 'scalar' to cell facets. mixed = scalar["facet"] + dscalar In PyDOLFIN we could do V_dg = FunctionSpace(mesh, "DG", 3) V_cg = FunctionSpace(mesh, "CG", 3, "facet") mixed = V_cg + V_dgI see now that we need to have the above option since the everything (e.g. the dof map) is created and compiled inside functionspace.py.We could implement it in FunctionSpaceBase, as an operator, returning a new FunctionSpaceBase, with the restricted element as arguemnt. However my concerns go to a sub space of a restricted mixed space (if such exists) see the other email. If we go for 1, (as you have already done ;) ), we cannot create a restricted mixed space using the addition syntax. mixed = V1 + V2Do you mean to then restrict mixed? I'm already doingPrecisely. After a second thought I think that doing it in the constructor is more clean. Makes life simpler. Is this also possible i UFL, I mean:e = FiniteElement("CG",cell,0,"facet") Should it?
Is that a PyDOLFIN finite element? If it is, then yes, that's how it should work.
Somewhat related, it's a bit annoying in PyDOLFIN that the code is recompiled when the mesh is changed. Can we avoid this? Should one then create a finite element and a dof map with which to initialise the Pythin FunctionSpace?
Garth
JohanV0 = FunctionSpace(mesh, "CG", 3, "facet") V1 = FunctionSpace(mesh, "DG", 3) mixed = V0 + V1 and it works. This type of restriction (we'll need to sort out our terminology) impacts the dofmap, which I why I think it needs to be involved in the creation of the function space. GarthIf we want a restricted mixed space we need to use the constructor. mixed = MixedFunctionSpace((V1,V2),restriction="facet") JohanGarthor V_dg = FunctionSpace(mesh, "DG", 3) V_cg = FunctionSpace(mesh, "CG", 3) mixed = V_cg["scalar"] + V_dg GarthKent _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev----------------------------------------------------------------------- - _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |