ffc team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:54:54PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>
>
> 2010/1/18 Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >Do we need both verify_tensor and simple_verify_tensors?
>
> No, the only difference is that verify_tensor is general (although I'm sure it is seriously outdated) and simple_ is not.
> I vote for deleting verify_tensor, if we for some reason need it later we can always revert and get whatever code we want.
>
> Kristian

ok, I'll remove verify_tensor and rename simple_verify_tensor -->
verify_tensor, and then try to make it run. I haven't tried it for
a while.

--
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature