← Back to team overview

ffc team mailing list archive

Re: [Branch ~ffc-core/ffc/dev] Rev 1502: Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be

 

On 21/01/2010 14:19, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> 
> 
> 2010/1/21  <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> revno: 1502
>> committer: Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> branch nick: ffc-unstable
>> timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 15:13:40 +0100
>> message:
>>  Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be
>>  (j, i) instead of (i, j).
> 
> Cool, I guess this means that the indices is based on some theory after
> all :)

Would the reason why the covariant Piola map doesn't contain a det(J)
but the contravariant Piola does be clarified on reading
RognesKirbyEtAl2009?

Harish



Follow ups

References