ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03371
Re: [Branch ~ffc-core/ffc/dev] Rev 1502: Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be
On 21/01/2010 14:19, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>
>
> 2010/1/21 <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> revno: 1502
>> committer: Marie E. Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> branch nick: ffc-unstable
>> timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 15:13:40 +0100
>> message:
>> Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be
>> (j, i) instead of (i, j).
>
> Cool, I guess this means that the indices is based on some theory after
> all :)
Would the reason why the covariant Piola map doesn't contain a det(J)
but the contravariant Piola does be clarified on reading
RognesKirbyEtAl2009?
Harish
Follow ups
References