On 29 January 2010 01:23, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There seem to be just a couple of issues remaining in order of
importance:
1. QuadratureElement
2. DOLFIN fem unit test
3. evaluate_basis_derivatives
4. RestrictedElement
Among these, I would say 1-2 are crucial to fix before 0.9.0,
but 3-4 are less crucial.
It would be good to have evaluate_basis_derivatives working, but I
don't know how much work is involved.
First my apologies for the late reply, Internet was down again all
morning and it pisses me off.
Now that BDM elements also compiles for gcc it looks like everything is
in place for evaluate_basis.
CG and CR elements work, and so does all linear elements and DG
constants. 2nd and 3rd order elements of BDM, RT, and DG type does not
give
the same result but there are explanations for this and at least it
looks
like they agree with the values you would get from FIAT if you tabulate
on
the reference element.
evaluate_basis_derivatives works for CG elements and for most elements
of
degree 1.
I'm working on some kind of unit testing framework for evaluate_basis
and
evaluate_basis_derivatives, such that we can make sure that at least
cpp
code and FIAT agrees on the reference element. If this test works, then
the
only bug can be in the transformation back to the physical element, but
since this works for CG elements I don't see why it shouldn't for other
elements too.
However, I'll put this development on hold until Quadrature and
Restricted elements work.
RestrictedElement is also good to have, but I would say it is less
important, especially since it's unclear what exactly it should do and
how it should be implemented.
It should be implemented like I did it in the old FFC :)
w.r.t. the demo, it should test if restrictions on a MixedElement are
propagated to the sub elements and that a restricted element can appear
in a
MixedElement.
