ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03797
Re: Tests for Projection.ufl fails
Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
Works fine here,
Ah, pulled fresh branch -- and now I see.
Projection.ufl has been removed
from the demos directory, but the reference is still
hovering around.
but I get:
Missing reference for Mini.out
Yes, will add once I've checked that the generated
code gives meaningful results.
--
Marie
Kristian
On 22 March 2010 13:49, Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The regression testing of Projection.ufl is failing for me (and has
been so
for a while).
Could it be that the references have not been updated for this form?
The first part of the diff is as follows:
-// This code conforms with the UFC specification version 1.2
-// and was automatically generated by FFC version 0.9.0-beta.
+// This code conforms with the UFC specification version 1.4
+// and was automatically generated by FFC version 0.9.2+.
+//
+// This code was generated with the following parameters:
+//
+// cache_dir: ''
+// convert_exceptions_to_warnings: True
+// cpp_optimize: False
+// epsilon: 1e-14
+// form_postfix: True
+// format: 'ufc'
+// log_level: 10
+// log_prefix: ''
+// optimize: False
+// output_dir: '.'
+// precision: '8'
+// quadrature_degree: 'auto'
+// quadrature_rule: 'auto'
+// representation: 'auto'
+// split: False
--
Marie
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
Post to : ffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References
