Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 26 March 2010 13:36, Andy Ray Terrel <aterrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Could you have ffc print out a warning so dumb users like me will remember this change when their code breaks?
That might be a good idea, would it be enough to put in the __add__ operator in UFL for FiniteElements? We didn't use __mul__ before so we don't have to put a waring in there although we could do that. Then after a few releases we can remove the warnings again, once the dumb users have gotten used to the new syntax. :) Kristian
-- Andy On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Marie Rognes <meg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Anders Logg wrote:On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 01:43:41PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:Marie Rognes wrote:Anders Logg wrote:On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:41:42AM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:Anders Logg wrote:On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:20:00PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:On 22/03/10 16:42, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:On 21 March 2010 21:32, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:After Marie's latest addition of enriched spaces (and some discussion with Doug Arnold), it seems clear that our current notation V + W for mixed spaces is not optimal. Even though one may think of the operation of creating a "mixed function space" as a direct sum, X = {(v, 0) : v in V} \oplus {(0, w) : w in W}, it is more natural (and common) to think of it as a Cartesian product, X = V \times W = {(v, w) : v in V, w in W} It would therefore be more natural to use '*' instead of '+' as the operation for creating mixed elements/function spaces. That would free up '+' to be used for enriched spaces (which have recently been added), X = {v + w : v in V, w in W} The typical example would be to take V piecewise linears and W scaled P3 bubbles. In summary, the suggestion is to use the following notation: + <--> + * <--> \times It's obvious this is better than what we have now which is + <--> \oplus ? <--> + Thoughts?Agree.Me too. Garthok. Let's change then. It will require changes in both UFL and FFC. Anyone up for it?I can fix ffc.I was hoping for that. :-)(Have no permission for ufl)You do now. ;-)Aka, I'll fix that too.Fixed: (a) ElementUnion is now called EnrichedElement. (b) (Old) V + Q --> (New) V * Q (c) V + Q = EnrichedElement(V, Q) Now, PYDOLFIN needs updating...Done.Great! (I'm off to do some Mini debugging.) -- Marie _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |