ffc team mailing list archive
-
ffc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03918
Re: FFC vs. SFC
I tried to run the code against the dev versions of FEniCS and got the
following error after successfully finishing the FFC part:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "demo.py", line 15, in <module>
V = FunctionSpace(mesh, "CG", 1)
File "/home/oelgaard/software/fenics/dolfin/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dolfin/function/functionspace.py",
line 230, in __init__
FunctionSpaceBase.__init__(self, mesh, element)
File "/home/oelgaard/software/fenics/dolfin/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dolfin/function/functionspace.py",
line 44, in __init__
ufc_element, ufc_dofmap = jit(self._ufl_element)
File "/home/oelgaard/software/fenics/dolfin/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py",
line 44, in mpi_jit
return local_jit(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/oelgaard/software/fenics/dolfin/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py",
line 87, in jit
p = form_compiler.default_parameters()
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'default_parameters'
Kristian
On 21 June 2010 15:42, <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, just portet SFC to dolfin-dev and ufl-dev and made some simple
> comparisons with FFC. I
> don't know exactly how representative these are, but I thought I'd try to
> compare
> them for fun.
>
> I have used the following code:
>
> from dolfin import *
> import time
>
> for compiler in ["ffc", "sfc"]:
>
> for N in [200, 400, 800]:
>
> parameters["form_compiler"]["name"]=compiler
> if compiler == "ffc":
> parameters["form_compiler"]["optimize"] = True
> parameters ["form_compiler"]["cpp_optimize"] = True
>
> mesh = UnitSquare(N, N)
> V = FunctionSpace(mesh, "CG", 1)
>
> P=6
> U = Function(V)
> energy = U**6*(U*U + inner(grad(U), grad(U)))*dx
>
> v = TestFunction(V)
> u = TrialFunction(V)
>
> F = derivative(energy, U, v)
> J = derivative(F, U, u)
>
> print ""
> print "First time"
> print ""
> t0 = time.time()
> A = assemble(J)
> t1 = time.time()
> print "First time for ", compiler, " was ", t1 - t0
>
> print ""
> print "Second time"
> print ""
> t0 = time.time()
> A = assemble(J)
> t1 = time.time()
>
> print "Second time for ", compiler, " was ", t1 - t0
>
>
> With these options SFC is about 3 times faster than FFC. How should I
> optimize FFC ?
>
> Kent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
> Post to : ffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References