fiat team mailing list archive
-
fiat team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00248
Re: Simplicial elements
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 07:57:43AM -0600, Robert Kirby wrote:
> Well, FIAT really does simplices because they're hard. Hexes and rectangles
> have tensor-product bases for H(div), H(curl), and H1, so you should really be
> doing spectral-type techniques. See the thesis of Heintsch (sp?) at NYU for
> some interesting work on high order H(div) and H(curl) a few years ago. Not
> sure if it got published, but it was very good
>
> I now have a user at Sandia who wants the other shapes, so I will be looking at
> doing this, either in Python or else with straight tensor-products in C++. Of
> course, pyramids and prisms present wrinkles of being somewhere in-between.
There has also been some interest in adding quads and hexes to the DOLFIN
mesh library (which should not be very hard) so this might also happen
(if someone has time to implement it).
--
Anders
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Harish Narayanan <harish@xxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I understand from the documentation in FIAT that all its reference
> elements treat spaces as simplicial complexes. Is there an obvious
> difficulty in extending this to non-simplicial elements (assuming the
> mesh is suitably generated elsewhere)?
>
> I would be curious to read some literature on this topic if someone were
> willing to point me to it.
>
> Thanks,
> Harish
> _______________________________________________
> FIAT-dev mailing list
> FIAT-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fiat-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FIAT-dev mailing list
> FIAT-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fiat-dev
Follow ups
References