fuel-dev team mailing list archive

[Andrey Grebennikov <agrebennikov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andrey Grebennikov <agrebennikov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: [Fuel-dev] Deploy OpenStack w/o OS provisioning
To: Dmitriy Novakovskiy <dnovakovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matthew Mosesohn <mmosesohn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Fuel-dev] Deploy OpenStack w/o OS provisioning
To: Andrey Grebennikov <agrebennikov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


Sorry. Maybe the rest of the team has an explanation for that. We have a
few feature requests related to this topic specifically.
On Jan 12, 2014 10:47 PM, "Andrey Grebennikov" <agrebennikov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> Could you tell me how exactly bootstrap node appears in the nailgun? All
> what we could imagine at the moment for adding the node with OS existed to
> Fuel env is to reboot it into bootstrap mode, add it into the env, then
> reboot it again into normal mode, install all agents manually and improve
> the database with pointing "provisioned" to the nodes. Is there better way
> for doing the same? Bcos when I tried to reboot one node with OS existed
> into bootstrap, I found that it cleared hdd somewhy (maybe smtng was wrong).
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Matthew Mosesohn <mmosesohn@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
>
>> I don't see why doing this on CentOS or RHEL will be any issue. You
>> would still have to register the nodes to the Fuel Master like we do
>> in bootstrap. I just think the only obstacle would be installing the
>> reporting agent on Ubuntu and setting up the apt repo.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Dmitriy Novakovskiy
>> <dnovakovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > Recently, lots of clients started asking me about using Fuel to deploy
>> > OpenStack on hosts w/o doing PXE boot and OS provisioning. I've
>> outlined my
>> > thoughts on this in a blueprint:
>> >
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-deploy-without-os-provisioning
>> >
>> > Now I'm interested in your thoughts on this, do you think a feature like
>> > that would be useful? Or maybe it's doable with existing functionality
>> > somehow?
>> > I know the team who did a PoC for it with fuel-3.0.1, and another one
>> will
>> > happen for fuel-4.0 soon, so maybe it makes sense to integrate this work
>> > with main project upstream
>> >
>> > Looking forward to have this discussion with Community
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Regards,
>> > Dmitriy
>> >
>> > --
>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> > Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrey Grebennikov
> Deployment Engineer
> Mirantis Inc, Saratov
>



-- 
Andrey Grebennikov
Deployment Engineer
Mirantis Inc, Saratov



-- 
Andrey Grebennikov
Deployment Engineer
Mirantis Inc, Saratov