fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00272
Re: feature request: Empty role
Oleg, we should be able to automate and include what Gleb suggests. I
think it could solve a particular deployment case where we want to set
up a separate node to do some monitoring or profiling task.
The way we configure cobbler today doesn't include a default vanilla
profile. You must configure the node via fuel first before it can be
provisioned.
In addition, I believe we could benefit from a minimal profile that
installs common libs that will be useful, like all OpenStack client
libs and vim. Feel free to elaborate here.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Oleg Gelbukh <ogelbukh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gleb,
>
> Doesn't separation of provisioning and deployment solve this problem?
>
> -Oleg
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Gleb Galkin <ggalkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hello people,
>>
>> I think we need an "Empty Role" in FUEL.
>> In case that you need to provision OS and install mcollective without
>> syncing the manifests and running puppet agent.
>>
>> For example I have a project with Swift standalone. And I need to
>> provision OS to the bunch of nodes for further manual installation.
>> It looks convenient to have an empty role in this situation.
>> Please consider it.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Gleb Galkin
>> OpenStack Deployment Engineer
>>
>> Mirantis Inc.
>> www.mirantis.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References