fuel-dev team mailing list archive

[Dmitriy Novakovskiy <dnovakovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ceph Replication can be heavy at times and may impact other types of
traffic. So if possible it's better to keep Storage net on separate NIC

On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Roman Rufanov <rrufanov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Does that means that we should never out Storage on separate physical
> network since it will be idle most of the time except when doing
> replication?
> Roman
>
>
>
> Roman Rufanov
> Technical Project Manager
> Phone: 414-736-0066
> Skype: RRufanov
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Aleksandr Didenko <adidenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','adidenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> yes, this is how it works currently (I'm looking at 5.1 cluster with ceph
>> right now).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Dmitriy Novakovskiy <
>> dnovakovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dnovakovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxx');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Question from one of the customers - in Fuel 5.x, are we still using
>>> Storage net for replication of Ceph/Swift only, and traffic between VM and
>>> RBD volume is going through Management net?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> *Dmitriy Novakovskiy*
>>> Sales Engineer, Mirantis EMEA
>>>
>>> *Skype:* dmitriy.novakovskiy
>>> *Operating from:* Ukraine
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>> Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx');>
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
---
Regards,

*Dmitriy Novakovskiy*
Sales Engineer, Mirantis EMEA

*Skype:* dmitriy.novakovskiy
*Operating from:* Ukraine