fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01632
Re: Fuel 5.1 all-in-one
AFAIR, we created this restriction because VM instances may eat all CPUs
and then there will be a lot of problems with DB performance. We just
prohibited a user from doing such "shoot-in-leg" configuration. We suggest
to use a number of virtual machines as a demo/playground environment
instead.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Aleksandr Vorobiov <avorobiov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Recently I've been playing and trying to install MOS in "all in one" mode,
> i.e. all services should be setup in one node. To accomplish this I've
> edited the file
> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/nailgun/fixtures/openstack.yaml in nailgun
> docker container. I've removed instructions which describe conflicts
> between roles:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> controller: name: "Controller" description: "The controller initiates
> orchestration activities and provides an external API. Other components
> like Glance (image storage), Keystone (identity management), Horizon
> (OpenStack dashboard) and Nova-Scheduler are installed on the controller
> as well." conflicts: - compute
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Strings in red were removed.
>
> After that I was able to assign controller, cinder and compute roles on a
> single node. After finishing deployment I was able to complete OSTF tests
> and checked installation manually, at first glance everything works well.
>
> The question is: is this behaviour expected and what issues could be
> faced in such setup?
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
--
Andrey Danin
adanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
skype: gcon.monolake
Follow ups
References